Facebook Developer Garage -> Fun with Algebra & Bilingualism

Don’t know if there has been a recent statistical breakdown of Canadian language preferences on Facebook, but last night’s fantastic* & long-awaited Developer Garage event got me into an algebraic mood.

Please play with these numbers & challenge me if you feel this is mingy!

One of our (many) challenges in government communications (oh, hai, I got a new gig…more about that later) is our commitment to French-language services. Some comms branches & agencies, strapped for time & staff, worry that there isn’t an audience for French-language content on social networks. Last night’s #FBTO presentation by Facebook Canada’s Alfredo Tan included some great stats that lead me to believe otherwise:

  • 16.9 million Canadians on Facebook (50.1% of ’09 population)
  • 54% female users
  • 9.5% French (1.6M)

Sooo…if we know that 9.5% of Canadian Facebook users are French-speaking, but we only care about Ontario (at Queen’s Park…not the royal we, okay?) …using StatsCan’s 2006 data (insert joke about non-Dark-Ages-government needing accurate population data here):

Let’s combine all the 289,035 French peeps with thecombo ENG/FR (26,050) & FR/Non-official/+ENG familes (3,065 & 3,405) for a grand total of 321,555 French-ish citizens in Ontario.

If total FR(& EN/Other) population in Canada is 6,777,665 & of those 1.6M are on Facebook – Pepsis have a 24% FB uptake rate.

We can now extrapolate that there are 77,173 Franco-Ontarians on Facebook. A definite worthy audience to plunk some effort & energy towards.

Now, who wants to quiz me on the periodic table of the elements?

* Strongly encourage you to track down the #FBTO presentations by  Syncapse (Stella Artois case study) & Vortex Mobile (Boston Pizza in-store promotion w/ FB-integration), both very good presentations that demonstrate the impact a properly planned, fully integrated campaign can have – & what data-rich results it can yield.

Labour Day of Love

My long weekends begin & end with an epic trek to the Sound & involve spending overdue time with the fam.  Despite the gorgeous clear skies, fresh rural Ontario air & infinite opportunities to sing ‘Save a horse, ride a cowboy’ at karaoke, I usually end up splitting this free time 50/50:  sleeping in & nerding out.

This weekend was no different – nerdery included a docu-binge, interesting new client/sector reading, and indulging in a thorough leisurely read of the Pew Internet & American Life Project report on The Internet & Civic Engagement, which was released just last week.

If the impact of the internet on political participation is at all of interest, download the entire report – it’s less than 70 pgs (incl. big’ol’graphs!) – not a massive undertaking, I swear :)

A gem gleaned/interpreted from the report is that once someone becomes involved in politics online – not necessarily partisan – they are on a slippery slope to nerdsville.  Posting a blog comment is practically a gateway drug for full-on civic engagement – next thing you know they’re signing petitions, writing their local representatives, writing & posting material themselves…& even donating cash.  Who knows what they’re doing in the streets to get this money to pass on to organizations & campaigns.

  • 19% of Americans online had posted material about political &/or social issues or used a social network for civic/political engagement
  • This crew was disproportionately young, of course, & also don’t show as much of an old/rich/educated socio-econo slant compared to other engagement measures such as donations & volunteering.
  • 61% of politically active online Americans signed petitions (vs. 32% of all adults)
  • 50% of online politicos have contacted an official directly.  (Very cool to note that satisfaction rates for contacting political officials was equal online/offline)

The authors posit that social media could alter the vast majority political participants being well off/educated.  The catch is ensuring that newly recruited online politicos start affecting change IRL.  We all know how easy it is to comment on a Facebook/blog post, or ping off a petition – but ratcheting up the free-time donation to include face-to-face canvassing, volunteering & other vital parts of being a ‘real’ citizen are tougher to nail down.

Now this is usually the part of the blog post where I complain about not having similar report from a Canadian thinktank or pollster, but that’d be unfair.  In April’09 Elections Canada published a Working Paper on ‘Youth Electoral Engagement in Canada.’ Thankfully I CAN complain about the age of the data – most recent year in the report was 2006.  The authors have similar conclusions regarding age/income/education as being the three determining factors in political participation as Pew.  The highest engagement levels create this familiar demographic combo: Older religious married born-in-Canada men who earn more than $40K with post-secondary education in rural communities.  Of these factors, being born in Canada was the #1 influencer, with post-secondary education a close runner-up.

Although I whinge about the age of the Elections Canada data, (even Pew study authors admit that without cell-phone owners included in their survey they’re not getting a true glimpse of the younger cohort) there’s a great section on ‘Why is youth turnout so low?’ that has a fantastic summary of previous political science theories on declining engagement.  Citing Cart & Eagles, among many other political scientists, the authors state:

“…the way election campaigns are run may be partly responsible for the turnout decline…traditional door-to-door canvassing has a powerful impact on turnout…evidence that direct candidate contact with voters has been decreasing over time, as parties have devoted more attention to the media…may have contributed to lower turnout, although it is not clear why this should have affected the youth more than older people.”

I couldn’t agree more.  Although online content is a great source for spreading information/sparking discussion/priming donations about politics & social issues, until the user becomes engaged with an issue to the point of ponying up volunteer-time – online engagement is a series of soon-forgotten empty gestures (green avatars, anyone?).

This ends tonight’s nerdcast – I’ll be online less this week because of an especially short work week for less than awesome reasons.  Heartfelt thanks to everyone who’s helped thus far (whether you know it or not :) ).  Equal gratitude goes out to a flexible employer & helpful IT crew who’re eager to lend wireless routers, webcams & laptops during a time of coccooning.

Just because you look up doesn’t mean it’s got to rain

Rediscovering CBC Radio3 couldn’t have come at a better time…mentally & work-ily preparing for the trek back to Canuckistan.  Like a good little borderline OCD nerd, I’ve got a zillion notes & links & half-finished thoughts & nutty schemes that I’m eager to launch.  Need to take a step back & synthesise all the thoughtful answers, interesting case studies & inspiring organizations I’ve encountered over the past two weeks & puree that into some coherent thematically-linked presentation.  Yeah.  Easy.

Well, my colleague Boyd makes it LOOK easy – he has a lovely post on his Intangibles Blog here after attending a lecture by Rahaf Harfoush (Obama social networking/new media strategist) at U of T’s Rotman School of Management.

Boyd’s takeaways beyond Rahaf’s presentation – in brief:
1.  SocMedia platform should improve intimacy among your audience
2.  Integrate, integrate, integrate
3.
No off-the-shelf social media solutions
4.  Find the digital sweet spot but prize agility

Would like to add my 2-cents/4-points after a two-week-pre-inauguration-navel-gazing-immersion-course (parantheses-&-hyphens-a-plenty, of course…):

1.  If you build it, they won’t all come, so deal with it – MyBO.com had significant membership (2M, & whether it was a ‘true’ social network prompted a cool debate during a meeting in DC…), but the BO team wasn’t so arrogant as to think that MyBO would supplant a robust presence on existing, popular social networks.  BlackPlanet, MiGente, Hi5, MySpace, Twitter, Eons, Facebook (Esp. ‘Facebook Connect’ w/ MyBO.com application broadcasting actions into NewsFeed), you name it, BO was there (16 sites total, over 5M external site ‘friends’).  (Bitter aside: If the Dean crew had a YouTube channel to leverage in 2004 & hadn’t been, essentially, forced to create DeanTV, it would have been a different ballgame…)

2.  ‘Social Objects’ are more relevant than the networks themselves.  To blatantly rip off TX’n transplant-guru Hugh, our intentions online isn’t to have a solitary experience – it’s to find a human, collaborative, shared space.  BO was successful because *he* became a social object – AntiBushites/Progressives/DeclaredDems/Disaffected*InsertGroupHere* name-dropped BO, & later co-opted his name, image, video clips, iPod playlists, history, narrative, quotes, & everything he represented/touched to coalesce as a group.

3. ( or 2.a)?) Build a digital infrastructure rooted in #1 & #2 – which means developing easy, slick, compelling prompts, apps, sites & materials to grow your audience, on all platforms.  Ex-1. BO’s iPhone app had a two-front visceral halo effect – physically people gather around someone as they demo it on their phone & are then compelled to ask its owner to email them (or vice-versa – people receive content from the app & want to watch it ‘in person/at work’).  Ex-2. Self-starting enthusiasts didn’t wait for permission to help/advocate/volunteer from campaign HQ via MySpace & Facebook – this is unprecedented from a political standpoint & generally with overall advocacy work via NGOs, etc.

4.  And Then? To defy assertions made in this seminal film, there must be an ‘and then.’  BO supporters were happy to take on the campaign gruntwork – logistically & organizationally – now they’re eager to share ideas. How can we use online collaborative tools to improve contact with government officials, link like-minded organizations, create more effective/efficient coalitions & crowd-source solutions?  How can we take advantage of the innumerable free tools, enthusiastic & skilled users eager to contribute?  First step – embrace transparency, design cleaner interfaces for data accessibility & farm-out raw data to organizations that can better organize/mashup/display what is public information.

Shrapnel

  • Facebook sprawls:  10M of its 30M users are 30+ years old, 3.3M are 40+ (FB Ads Data) – BO had 3.2M fans & there were 5.4M ‘I Voted’ Americans on E-Day
  • Hugh is true: “People respond to genuine social gestures instead of being bombarded with messages.”
  • This was the first election cycle where *boomers* were comfortable passing on political information online.  Even if a boomer wasn’t on Facebook, their email list makes them ’21st century political pamphleteers’ – (phrase h/t to Andrew Rasiej, Personal Democracy Forum)
  • To quote the first TV Pres, JFK, “Things do not happen. Things are made to happen.” Successful online strategies require the equivalent of successful field strategies – research, manpower, accurate demographics, compelling content and a charismatic leader (or social object).

These days I’ll sit on cornerstones & count the time in quarter tones to ten

Feeling like Eloise holed up in a nice hotel for this long.  Due to scheduling conflicts & miscellaneous foils, two of today’s interviews (eHealth comms pioneer & architect of major NGO’s digital strategy/re-weblaunch) were over the phone.  Produced very enlightening conversations nonetheless (made for easier note taking/furious non-eye-contact-typing, too).  Wrapped the day chatting in SoHo, visiting a collaborate social network for artists that’s taking community management/user engagement to the next level, growing exponentially & moving forward with innovative & useful (not just bright’n'shiny) tools for their ‘uber-users’ to beta test before full rollout.

One theme tied these very diverse chats together – know your user.  SurprisingEx. Mobile platform adaptation/adoption was not a huge concern for 2/3 interviewees because: 1) they’ve got bigger fish to fry; 2) their pool of users aren’t online via mobile devices & 3) it doesn’t serve the fundamental goals of the org.

All three organizations invested time tracking metrics, studying demographics and soliciting feedback to develop a very good sense of who they were/needed to reach.

The three organizations varied in size, scope & shape bigtime.  The largest, a more advocacy-focused NGO that’s registered over 300K members in its 70 years, is challenged by numerous offices mounting different campaigns & de-bureaucratizing/un-siloing an old-school site.  Engaging staff at all levels to adopt/accept a new web philosophy is a work in progress.  Shared colleague Collin’s phrase ‘Return on Intention’ to echo the interviewee’s explaining to colleagues that “the ‘front page’ is not nearly as important as you think it is in terms of findability or navigation.”  No doubt it’ll take many eAdvocates awhile, especially if they’re in older organizations with massive press-release-filled sites, to successfully proselytize the virtues of caring about the other ROI.

Will be publishing a white-paper-style presentation after the meetings this month, leaning against developing one-post write ups for each interview, too, it already lives in GoogleDocs, couldn’t hurt to publish mini vignettes, I just don’t want to create a siloed monolitic brutal web1.0 site of my own…

Hm.  What do you think I should do?